News

18.06.26

CFD simulation: Understanding and optimising fluid flow

Why CFD simulation is now becoming an essential tool

Products are becoming more compact, power densities are rising, and operating conditions are varying. At the same time, pressure is mounting to reduce time-to-market and improve energy efficiency. Traditional ‘trial and error’ testing on prototypes is too slow, too expensive – and often fails to fully capture real-world flow patterns. CFD simulations provide a reliable basis even in the early stages for the targeted optimisation of channels, housings, baffles, nozzles or cooling concepts. They identify hotspots, prevent flow separation, reduce pressure loss and incorporate thermal reserves.

What CFD simulation can do – and what it cannot

CFD numerically simulates the behaviour of fluids (gases, liquids, multiphase flows). Typical results include:

  • Flow fields: velocities, vortices, boundary layers, turbulence intensity

  • Pressures and pressure losses: local peaks, resistances, suction/dynamic pressure zones

  • Heat transfer: convective cooling/heating, temperature distributions, heat flux densities

  • Forces and moments: e.g. lift/drag, pump performance curves, fan performance

Limitations: Every CFD simulation is a model approximation. The quality of the geometry, meshes, boundary conditions and turbulence models determines the reliability of the results. The guiding principle: simple enough to ensure stable calculations – precise enough to capture the physics of the problem.

Typical areas of application – from microchannels to the factory floor

1

Electronic cooling

Airflow, heat sinks, ducts – optimising temperature peaks and fan performance.

2

Building Airflow & Indoor Air

Comfort, draught-free conditions, CO₂ removal, smoke and smoke extraction scenarios.

3

Process and Procedural Engineering

Mixers, reactors, filters; residence time distributions and mixing scales.

4

Automotive & Mobility

Aerodynamics, brake cooling, underbody airflow, cabin HVAC.

5

Pumps, valves, fittings

Performance curves, cavitation tendency, erosion.

6

Energy & HVAC

Heat exchangers, combustion chambers (reactive), compressor flow patterns.

7

Electronic, power-supplied components

Electrothermal simulations, taking Joule heating into account

The CFD workflow in seven steps

1

Problem definition & targets

What exactly needs to be improved? Pressure drop, heat transfer, noise-inducing turbulence, particle trajectories? Define robust KPIs (e.g. Δp, max. T, average velocity, degree of uniformity) and acceptable limit values. Without clear objectives, there is a risk of ‘colourful visuals rather than sound decisions’.

2

Geometric processing

Simplify (defeaturing), check for tightness, utilise symmetrical sub-volumes. Small gaps and unnecessary details bloat the mesh without improving the physics. At the same time: retain critical radii, separation edges and nozzle geometries where they dominate the flow.

3

Post-processing & Interpretation

Beyond attractive colour plots: integral metrics, line and surface sections, isosurfaces, streamlines. Analyse bottlenecks and derive specific design rules: where do baffles need to be inserted to direct the flow in a targeted manner? Which nozzle is suitable? What should the orifice area be?

4

Validation & Documentation

Measure, compare, calibrate. Document assumptions, versions, mesh data, model parameters and deviations. This is the only way to ensure that CFD simulations are audit-ready and reproducible.

Best practices for robust CFD simulation

  • Verify the plausibility of heat transfer mechanisms: convection, radiation, contact resistances; temperature-dependent material data.

  • Check sensitivities: How do KPIs respond to tolerances, boundary conditions and load profiles?

  • Team review: Simulation, design, testing and quality teams review the results together – physics takes precedence over aesthetics.

From analysis to optimisation: improving systematically

Once the main loss areas, hot spots or unstable vortices have been identified, the optimisation process begins:

  • Resize channels and baffles, increase corner radii, vary cross-sections.

  • Nozzles: Adjust convergence/divergence angles; use swirl selectively.

  • Heat transfer: Limit fin spacing, fin height and flow bypass; tune the fan characteristic curve.

  • Design space exploration: DoE, response surfaces, and, where appropriate, adjoint methods for directed gradients (e.g. Δp minimisation).

  • Multi-objective optimisation: Reduce Δp and improve uniformity; reduce temperature peaks and save on mass.

Practical examples (schematic)

Electronics cooling: A 1U enclosure overheated under summer load. CFD simulation revealed bypass flows around the heat sink. With a small baffle plate and an adjusted fan position, the maximum temperature fell by 9 K – approval granted without the need for an additional fan.

Air duct in production: A tight 90° bend in an extraction system caused a massive pressure drop. An S-curve bend and a baffle plate halved the pressure drop (Δp) and increased the air flow rate by 18 per cent – without the need for more powerful fans.

Building airflow: Draughts were occurring in a hall. The CFD simulation identified cold air pools and strong velocity gradients. The nozzle geometry and air supply angle were optimised; comfort parameters (Predicted Mean Vote) improved significantly across the area.

Governance & Quality Assurance

  • Traceability: Document all assumptions (inlet profiles, friction coefficients, thermal resistances) with version control.

  • Validation: At least one reference point with measured values; several for safety-critical applications.

  • Reusability: Save successful set-ups as templates – this saves time and improves consistency.

Roles & Collaboration

  • Design: Change management, design for manufacturing.

  • CFD team: modelling, simulation, interpretation of results.

  • Testing/Inspection: Measurement planning, calibration, limit value checks.

  • Quality/Compliance: Documentation, standards, audit readiness.

  • Product management: Target parameters, trade-offs, cost-benefit analysis.

Conclusion: CFD simulations make fluid flows manageable

With a rigorous methodology, you can translate complex flow patterns into clear decisions – and optimise at an early stage. Whether it’s electronic cooling, airflow, pump design or indoor air: CFD simulation reduces Δp, smooths out temperature peaks, stabilises processes and saves energy. The key lies in a rigorously structured workflow comprising objective definition, mesh quality, appropriate physics, validation and continuous improvement. This transforms the aesthetics of a colour plot into a robust competitive advantage.

Topics

News / Presse

Mehr entdecken

Weitere Beiträge.

Es sind keine weiteren Posts zu diesem Thema vorhanden.
Beiträge werden geladen...